net neutrality

RETAIN NET NEUTRALITY

TRAI seeks responses to the following twenty questions:

Question 1: Is it too early to establish a regulatory framework for OTT services, since internet penetration is still evolving, access speeds are generally low and there is limited coverage of high-speed broadband in the country? Or, should some beginning be made now with a regulatory framework that could be adapted to changes in the future? Please comment with justifications.

NEVER NO regulatory framework … WE DO NOT WANT A POLICE STATE

Question 2: Should the OTT players offering communication services (voice, messaging and video call services) through applications (resident either in the country or outside) be brought under the licensing regime? Please comment with justifications.

NEVER NO regulatory framework … THAT WE DO NOT WANT IT IS JUSTIFICATION ENOUGH. WHOSE STUPID IDE WAS THIS ANYWAY … SOME GREEDY CORPORATE OR CORRUPT POLITICIAN OR BEAUCRAT … ANOTHER STUPID CONTROL MECHANISM IS NOT REQUIRED

Question 3: Is the growth of OTT impacting the traditional revenue stream of TSPs? If so, is the increase in data revenues of the TSPs sufficient to compensate for this impact? Please comment with reasons.

WE ARE PAYING FOR INTERNET, AND THAT IS ENOUGH. STOP LETTING PEOPLE BE GREEDY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Question 4: Should the OTT players pay for use of the TSPs network over and above data charges paid by consumers? If yes, what pricing options can be adopted? Could such options include prices based on bandwidth consumption? Can prices be used as a means product/service differentiation? Please comment with justifications.

NO ! WE ARE PAYING FOR INTERNET, AND THAT IS ENOUGH. STOP LETTING PEOPLE BE GREEDY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHO FRAMED THIS QUESTIONNAIRE … STOP ASKING FOR JUSTIFICATIONS, WHO FRAMED SUCH DULL QUESTIONS ?????

Question 5: Do you agree that imbalances exist in the regulatory environment in the operation of OTT players? If so, what should be the framework to address these issues? How can the prevailing laws and regulations be applied to OTT players (who operate in the virtual world) and compliance enforced? What could be the impact on the economy? Please comment with justifications.

Question 6: How should the security concerns be addressed with regard to OTT players providing communication services? What security conditions such as maintaining data records, logs etc. need to be mandated for such OTT players? And, how can compliance with these conditions be ensured if the applications of such OTT players reside outside the country? Please comment with justifications.

IT IS ONE WORLD … STOP IMAGINING … ONLY THOSE WHO SCREW OTHERS ARE WORRIED ABOUT SECURITY !!! NO ! WE ARE PAYING FOR INTERNET, AND THAT IS ENOUGH. STOP LETTING PEOPLE BE GREEDY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHO FRAMED THIS QUESTIONNAIRE … STOP ASKING FOR JUSTIFICATIONS, WHO FRAMED SUCH DULL QUESTIONS ?????

Question 7: How should the OTT players offering app services ensure security, safety and privacy of the consumer? How should they ensure protection of consumer interest? Please comment with justifications.

YES – PRIVICY AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER INTERESTS IS PARAMOUNT, ELSE WE WILL NTO USE THE SERVICE. … IS THAT JUSTIFICATION ENOUGH ????

Question 8: In what manner can the proposals for a regulatory framework for OTTs in India draw from those of ETNO, referred to in para 4.23 or the best practices summarised in para 4.29? And, what practices should be proscribed by regulatory fiat? Please comment with justifications.

Question 9: What are your views on net-neutrality in the Indian context? How should the various principles discussed in para 5.47 be dealt with? Please comment with justifications.

100 % NET NEUTRALITY. YOU WANT JUSTIFICATION FOR FREEDOM … DO YOU WANT ANARCHY BECAUSE VESTED INTERESTS ARE GETTING PARANOID AND GREEDY ?

Question 10: What forms of discrimination or traffic management practices are reasonable and consistent with a pragmatic approach? What should or can be permitted? Please comment with justifications.

Question 11: Should the TSPs be mandated to publish various traffic management techniques used for different OTT applications? Is this a sufficient condition to ensure transparency and a fair regulatory regime?

No regulators … dissolve ANY GBODY THAT DOES NOT SUPPORT FREEDOM.

Question 12: How should a conducive and balanced environment be created such that TSPs are able to invest in network infrastructure and CAPs are able to innovate and grow? Who should bear the network upgradation costs? Please comment with justifications

THE NET EVOVED WITHOUT SUCH BULL-SIT CONCERNS AND IS DOIG PRETTY WELL, NOW SOME VESTED INTERESTS ARE BEING GREEDY AND TRAI JOB IS TO PROTECT FREEDOM, NOT SUCCUMB TO VESTED INTERESTS

Question 13: Should TSPs be allowed to implement non-price based discrimination of services? If so, under what circumstances are such practices acceptable? What restrictions, if any, need to be placed so that such measures are not abused? What measures should be adopted to ensure transparency to consumers? Please comment with justifications.

NO …. LEAVE THINGS AS THEY ARE … WE HAVE GOT SO FAR WITHOUT SUCH GREEDY BUSY BODIES, IGNORE THEM

Question 14: Is there a justification for allowing differential pricing for data access and OTT communication services? If so, what changes need to be brought about in the present tariff and regulatory framework for telecommunication services in the country? Please comment with justifications.

NO … IT IS NOT REQUIRED … IN FACT WHY SHOULD IT BE DONE … DOES IT BENEFIT THE PEOPLE AT LARGE … NO ! SO DON’T DO IT

Question 15: Should OTT communication service players be treated as Bulk User of Telecom Services (BuTS)? How should the framework be structured to prevent any discrimination and protect stakeholder interest? Please comment with justification.

DOES NOT BANDWIDTH ALREADY DO THIS ??? AND MY DOWNLOAD SPEEDS DEPEND ON WHAT I AM PAYING … IN FACT INTERNET SHOULD BE FREE 5 MBPS AROUND THE WORLD !!! IT IS THE JOB OF THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE THIS FROM THE TAXES THEY COLLECT

Question 16: What framework should be adopted to encourage India-specific OTT apps? Please comment with justifications.

LET IT EVOLVE… DON’T INTERFERE BECAUSE YOU CANNOT PREDICT EVERYTHING, HENCE YOU CANNOT PLAN OR CHANNEL

Question 17: If the OTT communication service players are to be licensed, should they be categorised as ASP or CSP? If so, what should be the framework? Please comment with justifications.

NOT APPLICABLE, RIGHT ? WE ARE TRYING TO GET OUT OF THE LISCENCE RAJ, AND YOU ARE ASKING COLONIAL QUESTIONS !!!1

Question 18: Is there a need to regulate subscription charges for OTT communication services? Please comment with justifications.

WHO FRAMED THIS CONCEPT OF ASKING PEOPLE FOR FEEDBACK FOR SOMETHING THAT IS NOT REQUIRED. REGULATE DOES NOT MEAN STIFLE … IT MEANS SERVE SOCIETY AND NOT BE A SERVANT TO A FEW PEOPLE JUST TO GET SOME CRUMBS !

Question 19: What steps should be taken by the Government for regulation of non-communication OTT players? Please comment with justifications.

GOVERNMENT SHULD STOP INTERFERING IN THE FREE MARKET. REPAIR THE ROADS, GIVE FREE EDUCATION MEDICAL TREATMENT, ETC STOP SCREWING AROUND WITH PEOPLES LIVES

Question 20: Are there any other issues that have a bearing on the subject discussed?

PLEASE KEEP NET NEUTRALITY, AND STOP GETTING BOGGED DOWN IN MEANING DRIBBLE OF WORDS. BE OF SERVICE DO NOT LET YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN BE SLAVES BECAUSE YOU SCREWED THINGS UP !!!!

Vir Rawlley

B 28 Pochanpur Extention

Dwarka 23

New Delhi – 110077

T: +91 9716107606, 9013591556, 11 28052686

E: virrawlley@gmail.com, virrawlley@outlook.com