Here are the 20 Questions that TRAI is seeking answers for…
- Is it too early to establish a regulatory framework for OTT services, since internet penetration is still evolving, access speeds are generally low and there is limited coverage of high-speed broadband in the country? Or, should some beginning be made now with a regulatory framework that could be adapted to changes in the future?
Ans: Net neutrality is important in a country like India which itself is a Federal republic. It's too early to even think about this.
- Should the OTT players offering communication services (voice, messaging and video call services) through applications (resident either in the country or outside) be brought under the licensing regime?
Ans: I think they should be allowed to operate without licensing hassles in the country. Only that, the network should be able to be monitored for security of the country.
- Is the growth of OTT impacting the traditional revenue stream of telecom service providers (TSPs)? If so, is the increase in data revenues of the TSPs sufficient to compensate for this impact?
Ans: No chance! Saying that Telcos should get a share of OTT revenue is just as if saying that electricity boards should be given share of all industry revenues which uses their electricity! It's ridiculous and greedy approach to net neutrality. If telcos are losing revenue, they're generating huge money on data plans. Technology evolving should be handled by competetive services, not by trying to avoid them. Same thing happened to state owned BSNL land lines when mobile services were introduced. Did they ever complain that their revenues were diminishing?
- Should the OTT players pay for use of the TSPs network over and above data charges paid by consumers? If yes, what pricing options can be adopted? Could such options include prices based on bandwidth consumption? Can prices be used as a means product/service differentiation?
Ans. No chance! Saying that Telcos should get a share of OTT revenue is just as if saying that electricity boards should be given share of all industry revenues which uses their electricity! It's ridiculous and greedy approach to net neutrality. If telcos are losing revenue, they're generating huge money on data plans. Technology evolving should be handled by competetive services, not by trying to avoid them. Same thing happened to state owned BSNL land lines when mobile services were introduced. Did they ever complain that their revenues were diminishing?- Do you agree that imbalances exist in the regulatory environment in the operation of OTT players? If so, what should be the framework to address these issues? How can the prevailing laws and regulations be applied to OTT players (who operate in the virtual world) and compliance enforced? What could be the impact on the economy?
Dont agree.
- How should the security concerns be addressed with regard to OTT players providing communication services? What security conditions such as maintaining data records, logs etc. need to be mandated for such OTT players? And, how can compliance with these conditions be ensured if the applications of such OTT players reside outside the country?
Should be discussed in detail with OTT by TRAI
- How should the OTT players offering app services ensure security, safety and privacy of the consumer? How should they ensure protection of consumer interest?
It's already handled by operating system and completely a consumer choice to get the application installed or not.
- In what manner can the proposals for a regulatory framework for OTTs in India draw from those of European Telecommunications Network Operators (ETNO)? What practices should be proscribed by regulatory fiat?
- What are your views on net-neutrality in the Indian context?
- What forms of discrimination or traffic management practices are reasonable and consistent with a pragmatic approach? What should or can be permitted?
- Should the TSPs be mandated to publish various traffic management techniques used for different OTT applications? Is this a sufficient condition to ensure transparency and a fair regulatory regime?
- How should a conducive and balanced environment be created such that TSPs are able to invest in network infrastructure and Content and Application Providers (CAPs) are able to innovate and grow? Who should bear the network upgradation costs?
Telcos are network providers and not software developers. If they want to generate income from applications, they should own subsidiaries to develop applications. There are already some available, e.g, Wynk from Airtel.
- Should TSPs be allowed to implement non-price based discrimination of services? If so, under what circumstances are such practices acceptable? What restrictions, if any, need to be placed so that such measures are not abused? What measures should be adopted to ensure transparency to consumers?
- Is there a justification for allowing differential pricing for data access and OTT communication services? If so, what changes need to be brought about in the present tariff and regulatory framework for telecommunication services in the country?
No justification, it's against the idea of internet.
- Should OTT communication service players be treated as Bulk User of Telecom Services (BuTS)? How should the framework be structured to prevent any discrimination and protect stakeholder interest?
- What framework should be adopted to encourage India-specific OTT apps?
- If the OTT communication service players are to be licensed, should they be categorised as Application Service Providers (ASP) or Communications Service Providers (CSP)? If so, what should be the framework?
- Is there a need to regulate subscription charges for OTT communication services?
- What steps should be taken by the Government for regulation of non-communication OTT players?
- Are there any other issues that have a bearing on the subject discussed?
--