Hello All,
This is with regards to the consultation paper, and I must say we should support net neutrality. The gist of my argument is present in the following email I had sent when Airtel tried to violate this, but I'll reiterate.
As a nation we've seen what happens when competition is restricted and innovation is stifled. We were stagnant for 40 years. We were brought on the brink of bankruptcy.
But then we opened our markets, and the great Indian economic miracle happened.
So we know what happens when a license raj is introduced. Why are we even thinking of making the same mistake again? What is the need for a digital raj now?
Our esteemed PM wanted to know why there was no Google from India till now. Why are we trying to stop any future Indian startups as well?
Calling things like Skype and Whatsapp 'Over The Top' itself is incorrect, since they are simply using the same internet as emails or websites. They shouldn't be distinguished. They use the same net as the rest of them.
The same companies crying foul over lost revenue are the ones that benefited because they were allowed to compete with the government telephone company years back. The government lost revenue due to them, but the telecom market is so much more better now because of it. They should be innovating instead of trying to stifle growth. They should be providing a better, faster internet to support these services.
Why is that? Why is a country as big as India, having such bad, slow net? Where are the internet providers now? And, most importantly, if they are having such a loss of revenue due to the so-called OTT services, how are they still making massive profits??:
1. Bharti Airtel Q4 net profit surges by 89% to Rs 962 crore, meets estimates
2. Vodafone India service revenue up 11.7% in first half of FY15
3. Idea Cellular posts 64 pct profit rise as subscriber numbers grow
Let's not assume things will get any better if the internet is restricted. It will only worsen.
Because innovation is the only way forward.
A concerned citizen,
Shashank