Question 1: Is it too early to establish a regulatory framework for OTT services, since internet penetration is still evolving, access speeds are generally low and there is limited coverage of high-speed broadband in the country? Or, should some beginning be made now with a regulatory framework that could be adapted to changes in the future? Please comment with justifications.
 
All over the world Net  Neutrality is  observed .  During Spectrum Auction itself TRAI should include clauses like OTT service and all other services should not be banned or charged differently . No regulatory framework should be made for OTT , since internet is universal and freedom to use should never be curbed


Question 2: Should the OTT players offering communication services (voice, messaging and video call services) through applications (resident either in the country or outside) be brought under the licensing regime? Please comment with justifications.
 
NO. NO WAY .  TRAI and Govt should promote digital revolution instead of  heeding to  Telecom Operators .
Currently  Telecom companies are bidding high value , thinking that  OTT will be charged differently .
It should be made very clear to Telecom Companies that , freedom to use internet in whatever way customer wishes should not be curbed . This is basic right .


Question 3: Is the growth of OTT impacting the traditional revenue stream of TSPs? If so, is the increase in data revenues of the TSPs sufficient to compensate for this impact? Please comment with reasons.
 
TSPs should not bid  for very high amount and then blame customers that they have invested high amount and they want  returns .  In this case both TRAI and Govt should make clearly that  Net Neutrality is not compromised at any cost


Question 4: Should the OTT players pay for use of the TSPs network over and above data charges paid by consumers? If yes, what pricing options can be adopted? Could such options include prices based on bandwidth consumption? Can prices be used as a means product/service differentiation? Please comment with justifications.
 
NO . NO. NO . Please free internet from all these rules .  If TSPs start charging for every service on internet then customer bill will exceed his food bill


Question 5: Do you agree that imbalances exist in the regulatory environment in the operation of OTT players? If so, what should be the framework to address these issues? How can the prevailing laws and regulations be applied to OTT players (who operate in the virtual world) and compliance enforced? What could be the impact on the economy? Please comment with justifications.
 
NO laws should be applied . Entire mindset seems to be OTT players are villains . Do NOT curb freedom of customers and internet


Question 6: How should the security concerns be addressed with regard to OTT players providing communication services? What security conditions such as maintaining data records, logs etc. need to be mandated for such OTT players? And, how can compliance with these conditions be ensured if the applications of such OTT players reside outside the country? Please comment with justifications.
 
OTT players should keep all communications confidential. Unless there is threat to national security it should not be shared with any Govt Agencies


Question 7: How should the OTT players offering app services ensure security, safety and privacy of the consumer? How should they ensure protection of consumer interest? Please comment with justifications.
 
It is between  OTT and customer . As stated OTT should never share any communication to any other agencies


Question 8: In what manner can the proposals for a regulatory framework for OTTs in India draw from those of ETNO, referred to in para 4.23 or the best practices summarised in para 4.29? And, what practices should be proscribed by regulatory fiat? Please comment with justifications.

Question 9: What are your views on net-neutrality in the Indian context? How should the various principles discussed in para 5.47 be dealt with? Please comment with justifications.
 
Net Neutrality is like a fundamental right . Do not curb this freedom . Airtel  did a wrong thing by charging  abusive amount amount of Rs 10,000 per hour which was removed after customer outrage


Question 10: What forms of discrimination or traffic management practices are reasonable and consistent with a pragmatic approach? What should or can be permitted? Please comment with justifications.
 
Only decent communications , personal should be permitted . Any communications which has criminal /national security interest should  not be permitted


Question 11: Should the TSPs be mandated to publish various traffic management techniques used for different OTT applications? Is this a sufficient condition to ensure transparency and a fair regulatory regime?
 
TSPs should not put any restrictions


Question 12: How should a conducive and balanced environment be created such that TSPs are able to invest in network infrastructure and CAPs are able to innovate and grow? Who should bear the network upgradation costs? Please comment with justifications
 
This is a basic issue .  TSPs should not quote higher value of spectrum and pass this to customers .
TRAI should keep all citizens , customers  interest . Just  not TSPs


Question 13: Should TSPs be allowed to implement non-price based discrimination of services? If so, under what circumstances are such practices acceptable? What restrictions, if any, need to be placed so that such measures are not abused? What measures should be adopted to ensure transparency to consumers? Please comment with justifications.
 
Yes.  If  TSP's start putting restrictions it will run into chain reaction of restrictions .


Question 14: Is there a justification for allowing differential pricing for data access and OTT communication services? If so, what changes need to be brought about in the present tariff and regulatory framework for telecommunication services in the country? Please comment with justifications.
 
NO. No way . Whatever data consumed should be charged . How applications are used will not come int he preview of TSPs


Question 15: Should OTT communication service players be treated as Bulk User of Telecom Services (BuTS)? How should the framework be structured to prevent any discrimination and protect stakeholder interest? Please comment with justification.

Question 16: What framework should be adopted to encourage India-specific OTT apps? Please comment with justifications.
 
OTT should be free and should not be charged


Question 17: If the OTT communication service players are to be licensed, should they be categorised as ASP or CSP? If so, what should be the framework? Please comment with justifications.
 
Please stop all this . Do not complicate simple communication between people


Question 18: Is there a need to regulate subscription charges for OTT communication services? Please comment with justifications.

NO
Question 19: What steps should be taken by the Government for regulation of non-communication OTT players? Please comment with justifications.
 
Gove should not interfere in Net neutrality . Actually even if Govt gets less money on Spectrum sale it is OK. This benefits whole community of citizens . Paramount to Govt is to encourage Net neutrality


Question 20: Are there any other issues that have a bearing on the subject discussed?
 
1.  TRAI shoule make sure in theie Terms and Conditions during Spectrum Auction,  Net Neutrality is  expected . They should not curb traffic  or charge extra the way customer uses application
 
2. If  we start restricting , we will run into plethora of regulations like customer can not visit ecommerce sites , can not use Skype
Do not make system complicated .