Subject: Net Neutrality: StakeHolder Views |
From: Ashutosh Muglikar |
Date: 30-Mar-15 8:10 PM |
To: advqos@trai.gov.in |
Dear Sir,
Reference is drawn to the consultation paper (https://trai.gov.in/WriteReaddata/ConsultationPaper/Document/OTT-CP-27032015.pdf)
issued by your good office inviting independent views from stakeholders. Here
is my view regarding net neutrality. Hope these views are considered.
I just want to say that according to the TRAI
paper on page 34, point number 2.54 it says that global losses to telecoms
due to 'lost' revenue of voice call etc will be $479 billion but that the
profit to them from data will be 2.4 trillion, that's $2 trillion dollars of profit,
after adjusting for their paltry losses. I hate how they even call them OTT or
Over The Top services. They say it's because those services run on top of
infrastructure of the telcos but it kind of gives the impression like they're
something extra. The name should also reflect that those services are the
entire reason why anybody bothers to pay for internet at all nobody gets a
3G pack to just stare at 3 on their handset. They get it to use the over
the top services.
The OTT's drive adoption of internet packs and usage of those packs:
·
In 2.60 they propose deep packet inspection, an invasive
technique that will necessarily have them monitor everything to check which
sites you're going to. So say goodbye to privacy.
·
2.50 claims growth in 4G will result in ten
times more subscribers to Indian telcos in 5 years.
·
2.12. Where they claim skype calls are loss of
revenue but at 10paise/10 kb and the skype min data for a voice call at 30kbps,
that's 60kbps to upload your voice and download the other's. That's 450Kb per
minute which means 4.5 rs/minute in data charges. This is the skype lost
revenue so what are they whining about?
Talk about how you would react if these service charges are placed. It will
not earn telcos any extra money, it will just reduce the 83% percent of Indian
users whose only access to the internet is through mobile. Since rural areas
are soon to be connected, this will disproportionately affect the common man
net user, who uses the internet only through his phone
Further:
·
Refer
to the recent Net Neutrality agitation, and the subsequent FCC ruling, while
deciding upon net neutrality.
·
Loss
of revenue to Telecos should not be the bar to progress, while investing big in
spectrum and infrastructure these telcos should have done “Risk Analysis”.
If they failed to do so then why should the general public suffer?
·
Net
Neutrality laws have already been enacted in The Netherlands after a similar
agitation there, we should follow their model or at-least consider the same before
deciding upon anything.
In
my personal opinion rulings in favour of allowing said regulation are
anti-development, and not what I expect from the Government.
I hope good
sense prevails and decision is taken in the best interest of the consumer and
the Country.
Jai Hind!!
Regards,
Ashutosh
Copy to:
Honorable Prime Minister Of India,
Shri. Narendra Modi
South block, Raisana hills, New Delhi-110101
Thanks and Regards,
Ashutosh Muglikar
Disclaimer:
This email and
any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
WARNING: Propelis Consulting India Private Limited does not accept any
liability for virus infected mails. Computer viruses can be transmitted by
email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The Company accepts no liability for any damage caused by
any virus transmitted by this email.